Molecular Motor Threads a Spiral Staircase

first_imgPhoto credit: Jude Beck via Unsplash. A Physician Describes How Behe Changed His MindLife’s Origin — A “Mystery” Made AccessibleCodes Are Not Products of PhysicsIxnay on the Ambriancay PlosionexhayDesign Triangulation: My Thanksgiving Gift to All Origin of Life: Brian Miller Distills a Debate Between Dave Farina and James Tour Requesting a (Partial) Retraction from Darrel Falk and BioLogos Intelligent Design Molecular Motor Threads a Spiral StaircaseEvolution News @DiscoveryCSCAugust 29, 2019, 5:57 AM Email Print Google+ Linkedin Twitter Share Tagsamino acidsATP synthaseATPasebacterial flagellumbiochemistryCdc48 ATPase complexcryo-electron microscopyDarwin DevolvesDarwin’s Black BoxDarwinian mechanismEdward Twomeyintelligent designJerry CoynekinesinMichael Behemolecular motorpeptide bondpolypeptide chainproteasomeproteinsRichard DawkinsScience (journal)ubiquitin,Trending Jane Goodall Meets the God Hypothesiscenter_img Evolution NewsEvolution News & Science Today (EN) provides original reporting and analysis about evolution, neuroscience, bioethics, intelligent design and other science-related issues, including breaking news about scientific research. It also covers the impact of science on culture and conflicts over free speech and academic freedom in science. Finally, it fact-checks and critiques media coverage of scientific issues. Share “A Summary of the Evidence for Intelligent Design”: The Study Guide Recommended Let’s get acquainted with another irreducibly complex molecular motor. This one is a master at unfolding proteins, even the tough nuts that are hard to crack. Its method is ingenious.One shouldn’t think that icons of intelligent design in biochemistry are restricted to the few favorites, like the bacterial flagellum, kinesin, and ATP synthase. There are thousands of them — tens of thousands! Each one is fascinating in its own way. Today’s focus is on one, called the “Cdc48 ATPase complex,” or Cdc48 for short. It’s another ATPase (meaning, it uses ATP for energy) with an important job: unfolding proteins. Most proteins, you recall, are folded into globular shapes. Some of those can get pretty tightly wound, held together with electrical charges and mechanical forces. Anyone who has tried to untangle threads, ropes, or fish lines knows that the tighter the wad, the harder it is to untangle. Here is how Cdc48 does its job — with finesse.Ubiquitin, as in UbiquitousBefore getting into the mechanics of Cdc48, it would help to learn about another protein called ubiquitin. As the name implies, it is ubiquitous in the cell. Because ubiquitin fastens easily to many domains on other proteins, it often “tags” them so that they get noticed by other enzymes. Ubiquitins can be chained together easily, conferring additional tagging messages. Some poly-ubiquitin tags tell the proteasome (the cell’s garbage disposal) that the substrate needs to be recycled. The proteasome removes the poly-ubiquitin tag before stuffing the spent or damaged protein into the barrel-shaped slicer-dicer, where its amino acids are separated for recycling.Another poly-ubiquitin tag informs Cdc48 that “this substrate needs unfolding.” Such a situation can occur when a protein is too tightly wound for the proteasome, when it is part of a multi-protein complex, or when it is in a hard-to-access area, such as embedded in a membrane. What happens when the protein fastens to the enzyme is quite amazing. The action was recently deciphered in more detail than ever by Edward Twomey et al. who describe their findings in Science. Get ready for a trip down a spiral staircase inside another molecular machine! Visualize Its ShapeTo visualize its shape, think of two hexagonal tires stacked on top of each other. A hand from inside grabs the end of the first ubiquitin, and pulls on it. Out the bottom tire comes an unfolded protein. Presto! What happened inside?Cdc48/p97 belongs to the AAA+ (ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities) family. It contains an N-terminal domain and two tandem ATPase domains (D1 and D2). Six monomers form a double-ring structure, with a central pore. Cdc48 often collaborates with the heterodimeric cofactor Ufd1/Npl4. Substrate initially binds through the attached polyubiquitin chain to Ufd1/Npl4 and then moves through the pore of the ATPase rings and is thereby unfolded. This translocation process requires adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis by the D2 domains and involves their pore loop residues. [Emphasis added.]In short, Cdc48 literally pulls its substrate through a central pore with force. The pore, they say, is shaped like a spiral staircase. Finely-placed amino acids that look like loops within the pore grab onto the substrate and pull it through in a “hand-over-hand” manner. It’s a powered string untangler!Where does the ubiquitin come in? The machine grabs the poly-ubiquitin “tag” first, and pulls it into a special groove in the machine. This gives Cdc48 both a signal to proceed, and also something to grab onto for recognizing the substrate coming in behind. An Amazing MotorTwomey et al. wanted to know more about this amazing motor.The mechanism of substrate processing by Cdc48 is poorly understood. For example, it is unknown how Cdc48 can deal with a broad range of even well-folded substrates, the only requirement being an attached polyubiquitin chain. Specifically, it remains unclear how a segment of a folded substrate can pass through the D1 ring to contact the D2 pore loops that power translocation. How these D2 subunits then translocate the substrate is also not known. Structures of related hexameric ATPases indicate a spiral-staircase arrangement of pore loops around the substrate, but structures of the Cdc48 ATPase engaged with a polyubiquitinated substrate have not yet been determined.The biochemists found a way to slow down the action so that they could watch it. To do this, they had to mutate the enzyme so that it didn’t operate so fast. Then, they captured “movie frames” using cryo-electron microscopy. Then they could put the frames together and see what was going on.The structures show two folded ubiquitin molecules bound to Npl4 located on top of Cdc48’s D1 ring. Hydrogen-deuterium exchange experiments indicate additional ubiquitin-binding sites on Ufd1. Surprisingly, one ubiquitin molecule is unfolded and bound to a groove of Npl4, which contains conserved amino acids required for substrate unfolding. Unfolding of ubiquitin is remarkable, given that it is an extremely stable protein that can survive boiling. The unfolded ubiquitin molecule projects its N-terminal segment through the D1 ATPase ring and engages the pore loops of the D2 ATPases. These pore loops form a staircase that acts as a “conveyer belt” to move the polypeptide through the central pore.Illustrations in the paper show the ubiquitins fitting tightly into a special groove made to order for them. The machine unfolds the first ubiquitin (like they say, quite a feat for a stable protein that can survive boiling!). This gives the substrate that follows a “handle” that the machine can pull on. The ubiquitins engage both the specialized groove in D1, but also the “conveyor belt” in D2, where a spiral staircase of six loops named A to F pull on the substrate, unfolding it in a hand-over-hand manner. The sequence of peptides coming in doesn’t matter to this general-purpose unfolding machine; it can handle them all. Particularly tough nuts may require additional ubiquitin “leader” chains:Our results explain why the Cdc48 ATPase can act on a broad range of even well-folded proteins: It uses ubiquitin binding and unfolding to initiate substrate processing. Cdc48 first pulls on the N terminus of the unfolded ubiquitin molecule. The structure implies that if substrate is directly attached to the unfolded ubiquitin, it will next translocate through the central pore; otherwise, Cdc48 has to successively unfold the intervening ubiquitin molecules until it reaches and unfolds the substrate.Why the Machine Is ImportantThis machine is important. Defects in Cdc48 can cause neurological diseases. Surely this must be a crown product of late evolution, right? No; the scientists did their work with yeast, one of the very simplest eukaryotes. And it is also found in archaea, considered by some to be the most primitive life forms on earth. One could rightly suspect that without this general-purpose untangler present at the beginning, the first cells would quickly become clogged with tangled wads of useless polypeptides. Need more amazement? The scientists found that this machine has moving parts. If you recall those old hand-operated label-makers, it’s a bit like that: the user would crank a handle to send the tape moving along with each letter. Here’s what the researchers found:The D1 and D2 domains both behave as rigid bodies (fig. S11). Superposition of the Cdc48 monomers on the basis of the D1 domains shows that the staircase arrangement of the D2 domains is caused by rigid body movements relative to D1 (fig. S11B). The angle between the D1 and D2 subunits changes dramatically from subunits B to E, causing a displacement of the D2 pore loop by more than 18 Å (fig. S11B).That’s a pretty large motion for a molecule. Here is how the general-purpose unfolding machine handles any chain:Five of the subunits (A to E) contact the polypeptide and form a pronounced staircase, with subunit A on top and subunit E on the bottom…. All substrate-engaged subunits contact the polypeptide through the Trp561 and Tyr562 residues in their pore loops (Fig. 6B). These residues “pinch” every other peptide bond of the extended polypeptide substrate. Thus, each power stroke of the hexameric ATPase moves two amino acids of the substrate, and the intercalation of pore loops between side chains allows translocation of a polypeptide regardless of its specific amino acid sequence.Where to GrabIn other words, regardless of the shapes or sizes of the amino acids, the machine knows where to grab. It “feels” for the peptide bond common to all amino acid residues, pinches it, and pulls with a “power stroke,” resulting in a large motion between D1 and D2. The subunit loops are in contact with the substrate all the way through, making sure it unfolds properly. But why doesn’t the pulling motion dislocate the machine as well? Therein likes another wonder. Think of a conveyor belt. The belt eventually moves back to its starting position. Together, our structures reveal that the D2 ATPases use a “conveyor belt” mechanism to translocate a polypeptide chain through the central pore (Fig. 6D). In this model, subunit A binds to the top of the polypeptide chain when it converts from the ADP-bound or nucleotide-free state to the ATP-bound state. The subunits then move downward, dragging the polypeptide chain with them. At the lowest substrate-engaged position, subunit E hydrolyzes ATP. Subsequently, in the ADP-bound or nucleotide-free state, subunit F disengages from the substrate so that it can move to the top position and start a new cycle. This is so like macro-machines we are familiar with: conveyor belts, windmills, sewing machines, and other devices that continually reposition themselves for continuous action. Other molecular machines use a similar conveyor-belt mechanism, the authors say, but Cdc48 seems to be the deluxe model with an added contact that “may allow Cdc48 (p97) to exert more force to unfold its substrates.” This is not simple chemistry. This is machinery with moving parts, forces and interacting subunits!As expected, the mechanism is even more complex than described here. And, again as expected, the authors have nothing to say about evolution.Would They Dare?Behe notes in his Appendix to Darwin Devolves that evolutionists have failed to explain the bacterial flagellum or the blood clotting cascade with a Darwinian mechanism. He gave them that challenge to Darwinism in Darwin’s Black Box twenty years ago. A couple of teams tried, but dodged the issue. The rest have remained silent. And yet they still keep their jobs, demanding sole authority for Darwinism in science. It’s time for some overkill: not just one or two molecular machines, but thousands of them, including Cdc48. Show them all, day after day, incessantly, faster and faster, until the most ardent Darwinist cries uncle. At first, if you have seen the old I Love Lucy episode, Lucy and Ethel could handle the conveyor belt of chocolates. They could excuse the occasional missed one, or swallow another. Let’s put Jerry Coyne and Richard Dawkins in their places and watch the fun as we send molecular machines down the conveyor belt for them to wrap in Darwinian explanations, and when they are really sweating, shout, “Speed ’er up, all!” Congratulations to Science Magazine for an Honest Portrayal of Darwin’s Descent of Man Email Print Google+ Linkedin Twitter Sharelast_img read more

Results of 2016 election show Interstate 435 the clear political boundary in Johnson County

first_imgA breakdown of last month’s presidential election vote further reinforces the sharp political boundary the Interstate 435 beltway has become in Johnson County.“When you look at Johnson County over the last decade the big divide is the 435 loop,” said Patrick Miller, a political science professor at the University of Kansas. “Clinton won most of the territory within that area.”It’s a very different Johnson County south and west of I-435. That sprawling area is solidly Republican although Miller said a bit of blue is creeping across 435.“That will be a trend to watch,” he observed.The overall Johnson County vote had President-elect Donald Trump defeating Hillary Clinton with 46.7 percent of the vote vs. 44.1 percent.Trump’s greatest level of support in Johnson County was 78 percent in one Overland Park precinct, his lowest was 20 percent in a Roeland Park precinct.Clinton’s best performance was 68 percent in one precinct in Fairway, her lowest was 24 percent in an Overland Park precinct.In the Third District Congressional race, which includes Johnson, Wyandotte and part of Miami counties, incumbent Rep. Kevin Yoder defeated his challenger Jay Sidie with 51.3 percent of the vote vs. 40.6 percent.Sidie failed to win his own home turf of Mission Woods, losing to Yoder by 11 votes, 61-50.The average voter turnout for the county was 73 percent. It ranged from a high of 85 percent in one Mission precinct to a low of 53 percent in one precinct in Overland Park.Miller attributed the difference in voting patterns between Northeast Johnson County and the rest of Johnson County to different demographic patterns. Northeast JoCo has a comparatively higher education and income level, he said.And people have different preferences about how and where they want to live.“People who tend to identify themselves as more conservative look at bigger home lots, aren’t as interested in pubic transportation, larger cities or walkable communities,” he said. “They look at areas like Olathe, Gardener and south Overland Park.”Those choosing to live inside the 435 loop tend to be more interested in walkable neighborhoods and being close the big city amenities of Kansas City. The area also has a younger and more diverse population, Miller said.“People look for different kinds of cities and unconsciously form different ideologies,” he said.Miller also said what’s happening in Johnson County also is occurring in other metropolitan areas around the country with more Democrats being found in the older suburbs while Republicans trend toward the exurban area.last_img read more

Salmon In The Classroom Egg Takes Scheduled

first_imgFacebookTwitterEmailPrintFriendly分享The Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) Aquatic Education Program is kicking off this school year’s “Salmon in the Classroom” program with elementary school students from the Kenai Peninsula Borough School District. ADF&G staff will be conducting hourly presentations at both locations. Bear Creek presentations are scheduled from 9:15a.m. to 1:45 p.m. and Anchor River presentations are scheduled from 10:00 a.m. to 2:40 p.m. Each school will take approximately 300 coho salmon eggs back to their classrooms to incubate. Next spring the coho salmon fry from these incubation projects will be released back into Bear Creek or at a specified landlocked lake. Students will arrive hourly at each location to participate in the egg takes and learn about the salmon life cycle, egg fertilization, external anatomy, salmon identification, and habitat requirements. Classes must preregister to attend the events.center_img Students will have the opportunity to attend two local coho salmon egg take events. Soldotna Fishery Biologist Andrew Waldo: “The Salmon in the Classroom program provides students a unique perspective they wouldn’t normally be able to experience. The incubation project allows students to watch their coho salmon eggs develop into fry and learn about the salmon life cycle in their classroom this year.” The first egg take is scheduled for Wednesday, October 3, at Bear Creek near Seward and the second egg take is scheduled for Thursday, October 4, at the Anchor River in Anchor Point.last_img read more